Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:183-196 (2001)
AbstractIn Being and Time, Heidegger claims that the history of the concept of time bears an Aristotelian stamp. In this paper, I dispute that claim. Instead, I argue that the history of the concept of time is primarily Augustinian. To support this claim, I demonstrate that Augustine’s theory of time is a quantitative theory of time, while Aristotle’s theory of time is a qualitative theory of time. Since most theories of time in the tradition are quantitative, it seems unlikely that they derived any significant influence from Aristotle’s theory, as Heidegger claims. But there are significant parallels to Augustine’s theory. This is true for both of the major theories of time: those found in Classical Mechanics and those found in Kant. I close with some speculation as to why Heidegger makes the claim he does concerning the history of the concept of time
Similar books and articles
Four-dimensional time in dzogchen and Heidegger.Zhihua Yao - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (4):512-532.
The Consciousness of Succession: A Reply to a Response to My “On the Mind’s Pronouncement of Time”.Michael R. Kelly - 2009 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1):127-139.
On The Verge Of Being And Time: Before Heidegger’s Dismissal Of Bergson.Heath Massey - 2010 - Philosophy Today 54 (2):138-52.
Education and the Concept of Time.Leena Kakkori - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):571-583.
St. Augustine on Time, Time Numbers, and Enduring Objects.Jason W. Carter - 2011 - Vivarium 49 (4):301-323.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads