The natural environment is valuable but not infinitely valuable
It has been argued in the conservation literature that giving conservation absolute priority over competing interests would best protect the environment. Attributing infinite value to the environment or claiming it is ‘priceless’ are two ways of ensuring this priority (e.g. Hargrove 1989; Bulte and van Kooten 2000; Ackerman and Heinzerling 2002; McCauley 2006; Halsing and Moore 2008). But such proposals would paralyse conservation efforts. We describe the serious problems with these proposals and what they mean for practical applications, and we diagnose and resolve some conceptual confusions permeating the literature on this topic.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Environmental Philosophy: Response to Critics.Sahotra Sarkar - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):105-109.
Similar books and articles
True Belief is Not Instrumentally Valuable.Chase B. Wrenn - 2010 - In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Zen Buddhism and the Intrinsic Value of Nature.Simon P. James - 2003 - Contemporary Buddhism 4 (2):143-157.
Nature Above People: Rolston and "Fortress" Conservation in the South.Hanna Siurua - 2006 - Ethics and the Environment 11 (1):71-96.
The Military Commander's Responsibility for the Environment.Merrit P. Drucker - 1989 - Environmental Ethics 11 (2):135-152.
Ii. Nature May Be of No Value: A Reply to Elliot.Don Mannison - 1983 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):233 – 235.
Rights & Nature.Andrew T. Brei - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):393-408.
Added to index2009-10-12
Total downloads565 ( #2,627 of 2,169,322 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #43,074 of 2,169,322 )
How can I increase my downloads?