The Neuronal Recycling Hypothesis for Reading and the Question of Reading Universals

Mind and Language 29 (3):255-269 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are there universals of reading? There are three ways of construing this question. Is the region of the brain where reading is implemented identical regardless of what writing system the reader uses? Is the mental information-processing system used for reading the same regardless of what writing system the reader uses. Do the word's writing systems share certain universal features? Dehaene offers affirmative answers to all three questions in his book. Here I suggest instead that the answers should be negative. And I ask: if reading is not universal in any sense, what does this imply about Dehaene's Neuronal Recycling hypothesis for reading?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are there universals of reading? We don't believe so.Max Coltheart & Stephen Crain - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):282-283.
Bringing development into a universal model of reading.S. Hélène Deacon - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):284.
No reason to expect “reading universals”.Yonata Levy - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):293.
Utopia: Reading and Redemption.Silvana Rabinovich - 2006 - Diogenes 53 (1):109-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-05

Downloads
36 (#419,193)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?