The Prospects for Reconciling Sellars' Images: Forty Years Later
Wilfrid Sellars described his Manifest Image and Scientific Image as idealizations of our common sense and scientific views of the world, including our own special role in the world as humans. If, as Sellars suggested, there is an irreconcilable conflict between these images, it may not be possible to reconcile science with common sense. The Scientific Image, as we have inherited it, has a strong reductionist element that seems to imply that things are not really as they appear to common sense. Although some amount of discrepancy between common sense and science is not a problem, since we know from experience that we may be mistaken about nearly any given thing, a systematic clash between science and common sense presents problems for the acceptance of one, the other, or both views
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Sellars's Two Images of the World.Jay F. Rosenberg - 2009 - In Willem A. DeVries (ed.), Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Oxford University Press.
Sellars and Sense Impressions.Robert C. Richardson & G. Muilenberg - 1982 - Erkenntnis 17 (March):171-212.
Why Wilfrid Sellars Is Right.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:291-325.
The Manifest Image ≠ the Commonsense Conceptual Framework (in the Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars).Andrew Chrucky - manuscript
How to Be a Kantian and a Naturalist About Human Knowledge.James R. O.’Shea - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:327-359.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #282,365 of 2,164,582 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?