War and intention

Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):174-191 (2011)
Abstract
Abstract Right intention is one of the staple criteria of traditional just war theory. In classical terms, right intention is met when a belligerent aims to achieve a just and peaceful order. I will address the problem of determining when a belligerent has satisfied the criterion of right intention. I will argue that right intention is determined by observing a belligerent's acts during and after a conflict. Intention is not merely a private mental act known ultimately only by the people who express the intentions of their governments. Rather, right intention is a communal, public act, for the observable circumstances are how intention is determined. I will demonstrate the effectiveness of this way of determining intention by concentrating on the stated intentions of the Allies before World War II and of the U.S. before the First and Second Gulf Wars. The goal of the paper is to demonstrate that the international community can check a belligerent's stated intentions both while the war is in progress and after the war has ended. I will argue that how well a belligerent conforms to the jus in bello and, when appropriate, to the jus post bellum, provide the international community with much of the information it needs to determine whether or not right intention has been met
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15027570.2011.608493
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Harvard University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Impure Agency and the Just War.Rosemary B. Kellison - 2015 - Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (2):317-341.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Right Intention and the Oil Factor in the Second Gulf War.Kenneth W. Kemp - 1994 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (1):15-20.
Intention Detecting.Richard Holton - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):298-318.
What Are Intentions?Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard - 2010 - In L. Nadel & W. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--84.
Getting Inside the Acting Person.Steven J. Jensen - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):461-471.
Is an Agreement an Exchange of Intentions?Joe Mintoff - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):44–67.
We-Intentions Revisited.Raimo Tuomela - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (3):327 - 369.
Are Intentions Self-Referential?Alfred R. Mele - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 52 (3):309-329.
Shared Intention and Personal Intentions.Margaret Gilbert - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):167 - 187.
Intention and Motor Representation in Purposive Action.Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Corrado Sinigaglia - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):119-145.
Exercising Doxastic Freedom.Conor Mchugh - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):1-37.
The Ethics of War.Patience Coster - 2013 - Rosen Central.
Added to PP index
2011-09-25

Total downloads
30 ( #191,732 of 2,223,792 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #423,227 of 2,223,792 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature