In Machine Medical Ethics. London: Springer. pp. 79-92 (2015)

Authors
Gary Comstock
North Carolina State University
Abstract
A properly programmed artificially intelligent agent may eventually have one duty, the duty to satisfice expected welfare. We explain this claim and defend it against objections.
Keywords satisficing utilitarianism  act utilitarianism  machine ethics  medical ethics  robotic ethics  AI ethics  R. M. Hare  Gary Varner  W. D. Ross  artificial agents
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Expanding Nallur's Landscape of Machine Implemented Ethics.William A. Bauer - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2401-2410.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Utilitarianism in Media Ethics and its Discontents.Clifford G. Christians - 2007 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2-3):113 – 131.
Utilitarianism and the Evolution of Ecological Ethics.Gary Varner - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):551-573.
Ross and the Concept of a Prima Facie Duty.H. J. McCloskey - 1963 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):336 – 345.
A Challenge for Machine Ethics.Ryan Tonkens - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (3):421-438.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-04-16

Total views
161 ( #61,002 of 2,421,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #26,458 of 2,421,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes