The Philosophers' Brief in Support of Happy's Appeal

New York State Appellate Court (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We submit this brief in support of the Nonhuman Rights Project’s efforts to secure habeas corpus relief for the elephant named Happy. The Supreme Court, Bronx County, declined to grant habeas corpus relief and order Happy’s transfer to an elephant sanctuary, relying, in part, on previous decisions that denied habeas relief for the NhRP’s chimpanzee clients, Kiko and Tommy. Those decisions use incompatible conceptions of ‘person’ which, when properly understood, are either philosophically inadequate or, in fact, compatible with Happy’s personhood.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thing: inside the struggle for animal personhood.Samuel Machado - 2023 - Washington: Island Press. Edited by Cynthia Sousa Machado & Steven M. Wise.
Introduction to the Special Section.Franklin G. Miller - 2023 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 66 (1):1-2.
On the Legal Status of Human Cerebral Organoids: Lessons from Animal Law.Joshua Jowitt - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (4):572-581.
Legal Personhood and Animal Rights.Visa Kurki - 2021 - Journal of Animal Ethics 11 (1):47-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-29

Downloads
446 (#56,549)

6 months
96 (#61,565)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Will Kymlicka
Queen's University
David M. Pena-Guzman
San Francisco State University
Lorrena Johnson
Loyola University, Chicago
11 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references