Using the PET Assessment Instrument to Help Students Identify Factors that Could Impede Moral Behavior

Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):129-145 (2008)

Abstract
We present an instrument developed to explain to students the concept of the personal ethical threshold. The PET represents an individual's susceptibility to situational pressure in his or her organization that makes moral behavior more personally difficult. Further, the PET varies according to the moral intensity of the issue at hand, such that individuals are less vulnerable to situational pressure for issues of high moral intensity, i.e., those with greater consequences for others. A higher PET reflects an individual's greater likelihood of adhering to the morally correct path, even in the face of high situational pressures and low moral intensity. PET questionnaires were completed by 506 students representing eight business schools throughout the United States. Relationships between respondents' PET and their gender, age, and major field of study, as well as the geographical location of their school, are explored. Results indicate that older students have higher PETs and that students attending schools in the northeastern part of the United States have lower PETs. These findings are discussed. It is argued that the PET instrument can be used to help students identify organizational pressures and intrapersonal processes that can impede their moral behavior in organizations.
Keywords Philosophy   Quality of Life Research   Management   Economic Growth   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007, 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9303-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency.Albert Bandura - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):101-119.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Students' Ethical Behavior in Iran.Mehran Nejati, Reza Jamali & Mostafa Nejati - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (4):277-285.
Why Do College Students Cheat?Mark G. Simkin & Alexander McLeod - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3):441 - 453.
The Taxonomy, Model and Message Strategies of Social Behavior.Tsuen-ho Hsu & Kuei-Feng Chang - 2007 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (3):279-294.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
8 ( #894,863 of 2,311,312 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #753,648 of 2,311,312 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature