Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology

Boston: Kluwer (2000)
Authors
Gary Comstock
North Carolina State University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,425
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Aretaic Objection to Agricultural Biotechnology.Ronald Sandler - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):301-317.
Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future Benefits Argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Biotechnology, Agriculture, and Rural America: Socioeconomic and Ethical Issues.Frederick H. Buttel - forthcoming - Agricultural Bioethics: Implications of Agricultural Biotechnology.
The Case Against bGH.Gary Comstock - 1988 - Agriculture and Human Values 5 (3):36-52.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-28

Total downloads
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature