What lottery problem for reliabilism?

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):1-20 (2009)
Authors
Juan Comesaña
University of Arizona
Abstract
It can often be heard in the hallways, and occasionally read in print, that reliabilism runs into special trouble regarding lottery cases. My main aim in this paper is to argue that this is not so. Nevertheless, lottery cases do force us to pay close attention to the relation between justification and probability.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01326.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,507
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and Lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
What is Justified Belief.Alvin I. Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]University of Chicago Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Evidentialist Reliabilism.Juan Comesaña - 2010 - Noûs 44 (4):571-600.
Justification and Cognitive Algorithms.Luis Rosa - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (2):503-515.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
83 ( #77,600 of 2,287,586 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #123,579 of 2,287,586 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature