Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):1-20 (2009)
It can often be heard in the hallways, and occasionally read in print, that reliabilism runs into special trouble regarding lottery cases. My main aim in this paper is to argue that this is not so. Nevertheless, lottery cases do force us to pay close attention to the relation between justification and probability.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
``What is Justified Belief?".Alvin Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
Citations of this work BETA
Contextualism and Fallibility: Pragmatic Encroachment, Possibility, and Strength of Epistemic Position.Jonathan E. Adler - 2012 - Synthese 188 (2):247-272.
Intrinsic Interferers and the Epistemology of Dispositions.Sungho Choi - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (1):199-232.
Similar books and articles
On the Prospects for Virtue Contextualism: Comments on Greco.Dirk Koppelberg - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):401--413.
Luck and the Domain of Distributive Justice.Daniel Schwartz - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):244-261.
You Can Always Count on Reliabilism.Michael Levin - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):607 - 617.
The Ethics of Lottery Advertising: Issues and Evidence. [REVIEW]James M. Stearns & Shaheen Borna - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (1):43 - 51.
Reliabilism—Modal, Probabilistic or Contextualist.Peter Baumann - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):77-89.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads76 ( #65,522 of 2,143,564 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #120,521 of 2,143,564 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.