Christopher H. Conn
Sewanee, The University of the South
Anselm’s On the Incarnation of the Word is presented as a letter to Pope Urban II for the purpose of exposing and correcting the theological errors of Roscelin of Compiègne, who maintained that since only the Son became incarnate, we must conclude that the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are numerically distinct substances. In this paper I argue that Anselm’s rejection of this conclusion involves an account of the Holy Trinity which includes a strongly relativized conception of identity, that is, one which allows an object x and an object y to be the same F, but different Gs. I further contend that Anselm buttresses this account with two non-theological examples of relative identity. Although it may well be the case that advocates of Latin Trinitarianism are generally committed to such an account, since they affirm that the Father is the same substance as the Son but not the same person as the Son, I take Anselm’s defense of this position to be theologically significant, first, because it may well be the first explicit defense of Relative Trinitarianism, and second, because Anselm’s position as a bishop and a Doctor of the Church is an indication of its theological soundness.
Keywords Anselm, Relative Identity, Trinity, Incarnation
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.14428/thl.v3i2.10263
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,047
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logic Matters.P. T. Geach - 1972 - Blackwell.
Anselm.Sandra Visser & Thomas Williams - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Logic Matters.P. T. Geach - 1972 - Foundations of Language 13 (1):127-132.
Trinity and Polytheism.Edward Wierenga - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):281-294.
And yet There Are Not Three Gods, but One God.Peter van Inwagen - 1988 - In Thomas V. Morris (ed.), Philosophy and the Christian Faith. Univ. Of Notre Dame Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Trinity.H. E. Baber - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (2):161-171.
Trinity, Generality, and Dominance.H. E. Baber - 2016 - Religious Studies 52 (4):435-449.
The Naming of Father and Son in Saint Anselm’s Monologion 38–42.John R. Fortin - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):161-170.
On the Geachian Theory of the Trinity And Incarnation.James Cain - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (4):474-486.
The Plight of the Relative Trinitarian.Timothy W. Bartel - 1988 - Religious Studies 24 (2):129 - 155.
Relative Identity and the Doctrine of the Trinity.Michael C. Rea - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):431 - 445.
A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm. [REVIEW]E. M. W. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (2):390-391.
Anselm on the Beauty of the Incarnation.Brian Leftow - 1995 - Modern Schoolman 72 (2-3):109 - 124.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,037,731 of 2,344,281 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #513,994 of 2,344,281 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes