William Conklin
University of Windsor
This essay claims that ‘access to justice’ has erroneously been assumed to be synonymous with invisible concepts instead of access to a lawyer’s language. The Paper outlines how a language concerns the relation between signifiers, better known as word-images, on the one hand, with signfieds, better known as concepts, on the other. The signifieds are universal, artificial and empty in content. Taking the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as an example, officials have assumed that Charter knowledge has involved signifieds (such as rules, principles, doctrines and tests) as if the signifiers were transparent. But any one signifier differs from another signifier without the lawyer ever accessing the invisible signifieds. Ironically, although the lawyer, law professor or law student believes that s/he is studying legal ‘practice’ and although legal knowledge has been considered a matter of signified concepts, the knowledge has really concerned the differentiating relations of signifiers. As a consequence, the moment of accessing the concepts (signifieds) has been forever deferred. ‘Access to justice’ has become access to the special language of signifiers, a language which lawyers alone are privileged to enforce. Turning to the Charter, lawyers claiming to know the special Charter language became indispensable to social life. Even the meaning-constituting human subject became a signifier, better known as ‘the legal person’ defined by Charter rights. Charter language, however, has deferred an access to the invisible concepts such as ‘freedom’ or ‘democracy’, terms in Section of the text. Access to justice’ has become access to the language of the privileged class of lawyers. The lawyer’s language has become a theoretical language in the name of access to justice. And yet, because the theoretical language has been propagated as concerned with ‘practice’, it has been difficult to challenge the social-cultural content of the language of lawyers.
Keywords Access to Justice  Constitutional Law  Canadian Charter  Freedom and Democracy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is There a Human Right to a Lawyer?David Luban - 2014 - Legal Ethics 17 (3):371-381.
Access to Civil Justice.Roderick A. Macdonald - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Justice and Access to Health Care.Norman Daniels - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Victim's Right to Access Justice (text only in Lithuanian).Rima Ažubalytė - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):221-244.
Just Lawyers: Regulation and Access to Justice.Christine Parker - 1999 - Oxford University Press on Demand.
How Privileged is First-Person Privileged Access?Michael Pauen - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):1-15.
Self-Attributed Belief and Privileged Access.Beth A. Dixon - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Patent Funded Access to Medicines.Tom Andreassen - 2015 - Developing World Bioethics 15 (3):152-161.
An Analysis of Factors Underlying E-Health Disparities.Cynthia Baur - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (4):417-428.


Added to PP index

Total views
69 ( #164,647 of 2,498,526 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #140,198 of 2,498,526 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes