Journal of Business Ethics 119 (2):151-172 (2014)
AbstractSocieties need markets, so just as trustworthy professionals are needed in fields such as healthcare, law and education, modern societies need trustworthy market managers, including corporate officers and directors. But in its screening of candidates, U.S. corporate business has lagged behind fields such as medicine and law, which in the nineteenth century addressed their need for screening by upgrading professional education and establishing licensing of individual practitioners. Corporate business, by contrast, has been too tolerant of problematic executives, particularly executives of a type shown by recent research in psychology to exhibit a set of personality traits including below average concern about bad effects of their actions on other people. Over-representation of this problematic type has cost corporate business the trust and respect it could earn by resting fully on a time-honored alternative foundation already espoused by many trustworthy teachers and practitioners of business. Society needs these trustworthy people of business to work together to establish screening of candidates for high level corporate positions by upgrading MBA education and establishing licensing for these positions. For reasons again based on current findings in psychology, screening candidates for the MBA could be significantly strengthened by requiring historical studies, particularly history of the corporate legal structure in the U.S. and history of the MBA itself. Upgrading the MBA and establishing correlated licensing could open the way toward corrections in the legal form of the corporation to bring it into line with hospitals, law courts and universities as places where responsible professionals pursue their callings on behalf of society
Similar books and articles
After Durkheim: An Agenda for the Scoiology of Business Ethics. [REVIEW]John Hendry - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3-4):209 - 218.
Ethics Education in Our Colleges and Universities: A Positive Role for Accounting Practitioners. [REVIEW]David F. Bean & Richard A. Bernardi - 2007 - Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (1):59-75.
Business Ethics Books: A Bookshop Survey. [REVIEW]Stuart E. Dawson - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (4):401 - 404.
Perceptions of Business Ethics: Students Vs. Business People. [REVIEW]Barbara C. Cole & Dennie L. Smith - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (8):889 - 896.
Globalization and the Ethics of Business.John R. Boatright - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):1-6.
Are Business Ethics and Engineering Ethics Members of the Same Family?Norman E. Bowie - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):43 - 52.
New Directions in Strategic Management and Business Ethics.Robert A. Phillips - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):401-425.
Twenty Years of European Business Ethics – Past Developments and Future Concerns.Luc van Liedekerke & Wim Dubbink - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2):273-280.
An International Look at Business Ethics: Britain. [REVIEW]Jack Mahoney - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (7):545 - 550.
Intensive Care for Everyone’s Least Favorite Oxymoron: Narrative in Business Ethics.Laura L. Nash - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):277-290.
True Colors: The Response of Business Schools to Declining Enrollments. [REVIEW]Marie A. McKendall & Stanton C. Lindquist - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (8):867-872.
CSR in SMEs: Do SMEs Matter for the CSR Agenda?Mette Morsing & Francesco Perrini - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (1):1-6.
Behavioral Business Ethics: Shaping an Emerging Field.David de Cremer & Ann E. Tenbrunsel (eds.) - 2011 - Routledge Academic.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Business School’s Right to Operate: Responsibilization and Resistance.David Murillo & Steen Vallentin - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 136 (4):743-757.
References found in this work
A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning Into Moral Subjects.David Hume & D. G. C. Macnabb (eds.) - 1738 - Collins.
Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.Amartya Sen - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):317-344.