“Do We Really Need Hepatitis B on the Second Day of Life?” Vaccination Mandates and Shifting Representations of Hepatitis B

Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (2):155-166 (2011)
Abstract
In the decade following hepatitis B vaccine’s 1981 approval, U.S. health officials issued evolving guidelines on who should receive the vaccine: first, gay men, injection drug users, and healthcare workers; later, hepatitis B-positive women’s children; and later still, all newborns. States laws that mandated the vaccine for all children were quietly accepted in the 1990s; in the 2000s, however, popular anti-vaccine sentiment targeted the shot as an emblem of immunization policy excesses. Shifting attitudes toward the vaccine in this period were informed by hepatitis B’s changing popular image, legible in textual and visual representations of the infection from the 1980s through the 1990s. Notably, the outbreak of AIDS, the advent of genetically engineered pharmaceuticals, and a Democratic push for health reform shaped and reshaped hepatitis B’s public image. Hepatitis B thus became, in turn, an AIDS-like scourge; proof of a new era of pharmaceuticals; a threat from which all American children had a right to be protected; and a cancer-causing infection spread by teenage lifestyles. The metamorphosis of the infection’s image was reflected in evolving policy recommendations regarding who should receive the vaccine in the 1980s, and was key to securing broad uptake of the vaccine in the 1990s
Keywords Hepatitis B  Vaccines  Vaccination  Representations  Imagery  HIV  Health policy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10912-010-9132-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,134
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Contradictions in British Vaccine Policy on Hepatitis B.Jennifer Stanton - 1995 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 17 (1):113 - 122.
Ethically Compromised Vaccines in Australia.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 17 (3):1.
Dentistry and the Ethics of Infection.David Shaw - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):184-187.
Should Smallpox Vaccine Be Made Available to the General Public?Thomas May & Ross D. Silverman - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):67-82.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total downloads
26 ( #252,728 of 2,308,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #75,389 of 2,308,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature