Inequalities and Fairness in Cluster Trials

Research Ethics 7 (2):58-65 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cluster randomized controlled trials (cluster RCTs) randomize whole clusters of individuals in testing two or more competing interventions. Here we will present the ethical problems raised by cluster RCTs concerning their effect on inequality. We argue that some inequalities generated by cluster RCTs are larger in scope than those generated from individual RCTs. We also argue that any cluster RCT-generated inequalities, which divide groups rather than individuals, are more problematic in type than the inequalities created in individual RCTs. These concerns should be taken into consideration when designing research at the cluster level, and those conducting the research should consider modified research design strategies in cases where they believe the risk of generating inequalities is large

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,484

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
24 (#783,018)

6 months
2 (#1,697,026)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Edwards
State University of New York, Buffalo

References found in this work

Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2):99-121.
Inequality.Larry Temkin - 1995 - Ethics 105 (3):663-665.
Egalitarianism.Richard Arneson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The irrelevance of equipoise.Robert M. Veatch - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):167 – 183.

View all 9 references / Add more references