Teaching Philosophy 35 (1):1-18 (2012)

Tim Connolly
East Stroudsburg State University
The last two decades have seen a resurgence of interest in the study of classical Chinese texts by means of the subsequent commentaries. New versions of works like the Analects and Mencius that include selected commentaries have begun to appear, making some view about the value of commentaries necessary simply for picking which edition of a text to read. In this paper, I consider the potential role of the 2000-year-old commentarial tradition in the teaching and learning of Chinese philosophy. Given the difficulty of the original works, does the addition of commentaries make things better or worse from a student’s perspective? How far should we go in emphasizing the role of commentary in interacting with the texts?
Keywords Teaching Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0145-5788
DOI 10.5840/teachphil20123511
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Renaissance of Traditional Chinese Learning.Shuguang Zhang - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):237-254.
Introduction:The Yijing (《易經》) and its Commentaries.On-Cho Ng - 2008 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (2):193-199.


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #251,115 of 2,333,946 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #256,105 of 2,333,946 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes