Logical Pitfalls and Communication Gaps: Frequent Lines of Argument That DeadEnd the Origins Conversation

Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 3 (66):174-178 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In order to promote more gracious and productive faith-science dialogue, this communication examines five pitfalls that it can be helpful to avoid.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fallacies and Logical Errors.Herman E. Stark - 2000 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (1):23-32.
Fallacies and Logical Errors.Herman E. Stark - 2000 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (1):23-32.
On the possibility of a privileged class of logical terms.Greg Ray - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):303 - 313.
Fallacious Reasoning.Laurence Goldstein - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (2):139-146.
Realistic Claims in Logical Empiricism.Matthias Neuber - forthcoming - In Uskali Mäki, Stéphanie Ruphy, Gerhard Schurz & Ioannis Votsis (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Springer.
Logical Dialogue-games and Fallacies.Douglas N. Walton - 1984 - Lanham, Md. : University Press of America.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-18

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Contakes
Westmont College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references