Modal Extensions of Sub-classical Logics for Recovering Classical Logic

Logica Universalis 7 (1):71-86 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we introduce non-normal modal extensions of the sub-classical logics CLoN, CluN and CLaN, in the same way that S0.5 0 extends classical logic. The first modal system is both paraconsistent and paracomplete, while the second one is paraconsistent and the third is paracomplete. Despite being non-normal, these systems are sound and complete for a suitable Kripke semantics. We also show that these systems are appropriate for interpreting □ as “is provable in classical logic”. This allows us to recover the theorems of propositional classical logic within three sub-classical modal systems

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,326

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-10

Downloads
84 (#210,212)

6 months
21 (#188,896)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcelo Coniglio
University of Campinas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An introduction to modal logic.G. E. Hughes - 1968 - London,: Methuen. Edited by M. J. Cresswell.
An essay in classical modal logic.Krister Segerberg - 1971 - Uppsala,: Filosofiska föreningen och Filosofiska institutionen vid Uppsala universitet.
Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I. Normal Propositional Calculi.Saul A. Kripke - 1963 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9 (5‐6):67-96.
The Logic of Provability.George Boolos - 1993 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
New foundations for Lewis modal systems.E. J. Lemmon - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (2):176-186.

View all 8 references / Add more references