On Operator N and Wittgenstein’s Logical Philosophy


Abstract
In this paper, I provide a new reading of Wittgenstein’s N operator, and of its significance within his early logical philosophy. I thereby aim to resolve a longstanding scholarly controversy concerning the expressive completeness of N. Within the debate between Fogelin and Geach in particular, an apparent dilemma emerged to the effect that we must either concede Fogelin’s claim that N is expressively incomplete, or reject certain fundamental tenets within Wittgenstein’s logical philosophy. Despite their various points of disagreement, however, Fogelin and Geach nevertheless share several common and problematic assumptions regarding Wittgenstein’s logical philosophy, and it is these mistaken assumptions which are the source of the dilemma. Once we recognize and correct these, and other, associated expository errors, it will become clear how to reconcile the expressive completeness of Wittgenstein’s N operator, with several commonly recognized features of, and fundamental theses within, the Tractarian logical system.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.15173/jhap.v5i4.2963
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,728
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1920 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 89:465-466.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Power and the Limits of Wittgenstein's N Operator.James W. McGray - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (2):143-169.
Analysis of Quantifiers in Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Critical Survey.Dale Jacquette - 2001 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 4:191-202.
Wittgenstein and Logical Necessity.A. B. Levison - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):367-373.
Logical Atomism in Russell and Wittgenstein.Ian Proops - 2011 - In Marie McGinn & Oskari Kuusela (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein.Robert J. Fogelin - 2013 - Routledge.
Wittgenstein.Robert J. Fogelin - 1995 - Routledge.
Wittgenstein.Robert J. Fogelin - 2015 - Routledge.
The Tractatus on Logical Consequence.José L. Zalabardo - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):425-442.
Later Wittgenstein on Logical Rules.Tomas Cana - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (2):109-121.
Peirce's Arrow and Satzsystem: A Logical View for the Language-Game.Rafael Duarte Oliveira Venancio - 2013 - Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies 1 (5):265-273.
Russellian and Wittgensteinian Atomism.Paul M. Livingston - 2001 - Philosophical Investigations 24 (1):30-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-15

Total views
37 ( #228,026 of 2,264,682 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #186,489 of 2,264,682 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature