Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):477-490 (2006)

Authors
Hangqing Cong
Zhejiang University
Abstract
This essay explores numerous and complicated naturalized epistemology against the background of pragmatism. We distinguish three programmes of naturalized epistemology: strong, moderate, and weak. By considering commitments of pragmatism on which different programmes depend, we point out the close-knit relationship between pragmatism and naturalized epistemology. We also illustrate the essential origin of today's controversy over naturalized epistemology and predict the uptrend of naturalized epistemology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11466-006-0020-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,256
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pragmatic Commitments to Naturalized Epistemology.Cong Hangqing & Cheng Xiaodong - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):477-490.
A Dilemma for Naturalized Epistemology?Shane Oakley - 2011 - In Michael Shaffer & Michael Veber (eds.), What Place for the A Priori? Open Court. pp. 157.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-19

Total views
5 ( #1,143,514 of 2,419,622 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,199 of 2,419,622 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes