Passive Knowledge: How to Make Sense of Kant's A Priori - Or How Not to Be “Too Busily Subsuming”

Open Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):39 (2011)
Abstract
Subjectivists, taking the “collapse” of the observation-interpretation contrast much too seriously, are led to imagine that even perceptual knowledge is active. And therefore subject dependent. Turning the tables on this popular trend, I argue that even conceptual knowledge is passive. Kant’s epistemology is conceptual. But if also active, then incoherent. If synthetic a priori truths are to follow upon our mental activity, they were neither true nor, far less, a priori before that activity. “A priori” and “active” are contradictory attributes of knowledge. As, indeed, are “a priori” and “subject-dependent” to begin with. Nothing a priori can be dependent on anything except itself, and least of all on the human subject. Kant does consider the active aspect of thought. The difference is that for him the more active it becomes, the less it is to be trusted. For we are no longer in the province of the Understanding, and its necessary truths, but in the realm of Pure Reason and its dialectical antinomies. Cognition activists who take a liking to Kant have simply mistaken Reason for the Understanding. And Reason is to Kant “the seat of all transcendental illusion”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4236/ojpp.2011.12008
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,153
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Metaphysical Motives of Kant's Analytic–Synthetic Distinction.Desmond Hogan - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):267-307.
Apriority in Kant and Merleau-Ponty.M. C. Dillon - 1987 - Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):403-423.
Contingent A Priori Knowledge.John Turri - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):327-344.
Frege and Kant on Geometry.Michael Dummett - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):233 – 254.
Kant and the Problem of Experience.Hannah Ginsborg - 2006 - Philosophical Topics 34 (1/2):59-106.
A Priori Knowledge, Experience and Defeasibility.Hamid Vahid - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (2):173 – 188.
On the Psychogenesis of the a Priori: Jean Piaget's Critique of Kant.Horst Pfeiffle - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (5):487-498.
The Ontology of Kant's Theory of Knowledge.Robert Greenberg - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:39-48.
Problem syntetyczności sądów a priori w ujęciu Hermanna Lotzego.Wojciech Hanuszkiewicz - 2012 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 2 (2):363-376.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total downloads
33 ( #200,547 of 2,308,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #165,558 of 2,308,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature