Stich and Nisbett on justifying inference rules

Philosophy of Science 50 (2):326-331 (1983)
Abstract
Stich and Nisbett offer an analysis of the concept of a justified inference rule, building upon the efforts of Goodman. They fault Goodman's view on the grounds that it is incompatible with some recent psychological research on reasoning. We criticize their proposal by arguing that it is subject to much the same objections as those they raise against other accounts
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289115
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,711
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Deflationism and Logic.Christopher Gauker - 1999 - Facta Philosophica (1):167-199.
Rules for Reasoning.Richard E. Nisbett (ed.) - 1993 - L. Erlbaum Associates.
Beyond Inference in Perception.Stephen P. Stich - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:553 - 560.
Logic as Instrument: The Millian View on the Role of Logic.Ken Akiba - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):73-83.
Empirical Equivalence, Explanatory Force, and the Inference to the Best Theory.Igor Douven - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):281-309.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

24 ( #202,526 of 2,146,278 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,504 of 2,146,278 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums