Toward a Peircean Response to MacKinnon’s Question

American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 33 (1):74-86 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1968 Donald M. MacKinnon (1913-94), the Scottish philosopher and theologian, posed the rhetorical question: "Does not metaphysics sometimes emerge as the attempt to convert poetry into the logically admissible?"1 An elucidation of this implicit assertion may bring to light a useful perspective on the nucleus of the metaphysical enterprise that promotes the interanimation of philosophy and theology. At least, that is the ambition of a longer-term project.2However, in this essay,3 I will presuppose an affirmative response to MacKinnon's question and concentrate on three goals: (1) show that Peirce's Normative Sciences are an appropriate prism through which to investigate the cogency of a trajectory from poetry to ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Gadamerian Response to MacKinnon.Jarett Weintraub - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):60-75.
Peirce: Underdetermination, agnosticism, and related mistakes.P. D. Magnus - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):26 – 37.
God, sex and war.Donald MacKenzie MacKinnon (ed.) - 1965 - Philadelphia,: Westminster Press.
A Peircean Response to the Realist-Empiricist Debate.Steven French - 1989 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 25 (3):293 - 307.
The Fundamental Question.Arthur Witherall - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:53-87.
The phenomenology of pornography.E. C. - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (2):177-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-02

Downloads
33 (#472,429)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Narrative explanation.J. David Velleman - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (1):1-25.

Add more references