The residual normality assumption and models of cognition in schizophrenia

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):753-754 (2002)

Abstract

Thomas & Karmiloff- Smith ’ argument that the Residual Normality assumption is not valid for developmental disorders has implications for models of cognition in schizophrenia, a disorder that may involve a neurodevelopmental pathogenesis. A limiting factor for such theories is the lack of understanding about the nature of the cognitive system. Moreover, it is unclear how the proposal that modularization emerges from developmental processes would change that fundamental question

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#413,027)

6 months
1 (#388,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evidence for a Domain-Specific Deficit in Developmental Dyslexia.Franck Ramus - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):767-768.
Did Residual Normality Ever Have a Chance?Susan C. Levine, Terry Regier & Tracy L. Solomon - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):759-760.
Residual Normality: Friend or Foe?Michael Thomas & Annette Karmiloff-Smith - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):772-780.
The Beauty of Models for Developmental Disorders.J. Briscoe - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):750-752.