The Strong Free Will Theorem
The two theories that revolutionized physics in the twentieth century, relativity and quantum mechanics, are full of predictions that defy common sense. Recently, we used three such paradoxical ideas to prove “The Free Will Theorem” (strengthened here), which is the culmination of a series of theorems about quantum mechanics that began in the 1960s. It asserts, roughly, that if indeed we humans have free will, then elementary particles already have their own small share of this valuable commodity. More precisely, if the experimenter can freely choose the directions in which to orient his apparatus in a certain measurement, then the particle’s response (to be pedantic—the universe’s response near the particle) is not determined by the entire previous history of the universe. Our argument combines the well-known consequence of relativity theory, that the time order of space-like separated events is not absolute, with the EPR paradox discovered by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen in 1935, and the Kochen-Specker Paradox of 1967 (See .) We follow Bohm in using a spin version of EPR and Peres in using his set of 33 directions, rather than the original configuration used by Kochen and Specker. More contentiously, the argument also involves the notion of free will, but we postpone further discussion of this to the last section of the article. Note that our proof does not mention “probabilities” or the “states” that determine them, which is..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Free Will, Information, Quantum Mechanics, and Biology.Peter Schuster - 2009 - Complexity 15 (1):8-10.
The Intrinsic Quantum Nature of Nash Equilibrium Mixtures.Yohan Pelosse - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (1):25-64.
Similar books and articles
Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and EPR.Robert Clifton, Constantine Pagonis & Itamar Pitowsky - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:114 - 128.
The Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen Argument and the Bell Inequalities.László E. Szabó - 2008 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's Theorem and the Effectiveness of Gleason's Theorem.Itamar Pitowsky - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):177-194.
Added to index2009-09-30
Total downloads115 ( #43,266 of 2,178,171 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,171 )
How can I increase my downloads?