Weakly Free Multialgebras

Bulletin of the Section of Logic 51 (1):109-141 (2022)


In abstract algebraic logic, many systems, such as those paraconsistent logics taking inspiration from da Costa's hierarchy, are not algebraizable by even the broadest standard methodologies, as that of Blok and Pigozzi. However, these logics can be semantically characterized by means of non-deterministic algebraic structures such as Nmatrices, RNmatrices and swap structures. These structures are based on multialgebras, which generalize algebras by allowing the result of an operation to assume a non-empty set of values. This leads to an interest in exploring the foundations of multialgebras applied to the study of logic systems. It is well known from universal algebra that, for every signature \, there exist algebras over \ which are absolutely free, meaning that they do not satisfy any identities or, alternatively, satisfy the universal mapping property for the class of \-algebras. Furthermore, once we fix a cardinality of the generating set, they are, up to isomorphisms, unique, and equal to algebras of terms. Equivalently, the forgetful functor, from the category of \-algebras to Set, has a left adjoint. This result does not extend to multialgebras. Not only multialgebras satisfying the universal mapping property do not exist, but the forgetful functor \, from the category of \-multialgebras to Set, does not have a left adjoint. In this paper we generalize, in a natural way, algebras of terms to multialgebras of terms, whose family of submultialgebras enjoys many properties of the former. One example is that, to every pair consisting of a function, from a submultialgebra of a multialgebra of terms to another multialgebra, and a collection of choices, there corresponds a unique homomorphism, what resembles the universal mapping property. Another example is that the multialgebras of terms are generated by a set that may be viewed as a strong basis, which we call the ground of the multialgebra. Submultialgebras of multialgebras of terms are what we call weakly free multialgebras. Finally, with these definitions at hand, we offer a simple proof that multialgebras with the universal mapping property for the class of all multialgebras do not exist and that \ does not have a left adjoint.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

1 (#1,560,988)

6 months
1 (#386,040)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcelo Coniglio
University of Campinas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Weakly Free Multialgebras.Marcelo E. Coniglio & Guilherme V. Toledo - 2022 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 51 (1):109-141.
Weakly Algebraizable Logics.Janusz Czelakowski & Ramon Jansana - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):641-668.
Weakly Algebraizable Logics.Janusz Czelakowski & Ramon Jansana - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):641-668.
Being Low Along a Sequence and Elsewhere.Wolfgang Merkle & Liang Yu - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (2):497-516.
Fibring in the Leibniz Hierarchy.Victor Fernández & Marcelo Coniglio - 2007 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 15 (5-6):475-501.
Behavioral Algebraization of da Costa's C-Systems.Carlos Caleiro & Ricardo Gonçalves - 2009 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 19 (2):127-148.
Logics with Disjunction and Proof by Cases.San-min Wang & Petr Cintula - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (5):435-446.