Are Automatic Imitation and Spatial Compatibility Mediated by Different Processes?

Cognitive Science 37 (4):605-630 (2013)
Abstract
Automatic imitation or “imitative compatibility” is thought to be mediated by the mirror neuron system and to be a laboratory model of the motor mimicry that occurs spontaneously in naturalistic social interaction. Imitative compatibility and spatial compatibility effects are known to depend on different stimulus dimensions—body movement topography and relative spatial position. However, it is not yet clear whether these two types of stimulus–response compatibility effect are mediated by the same or different cognitive processes. We present an interactive activation model of imitative and spatial compatibility, based on a dual-route architecture, which substantiates the view they are mediated by processes of the same kind. The model, which is in many ways a standard application of the interactive activation approach, simulates all key results of a recent study by Catmur and Heyes (2011). Specifically, it captures the difference in the relative size of imitative and spatial compatibility effects; the lack of interaction when the imperative and irrelevant stimuli are presented simultaneously; the relative speed of responses in a quintile analysis when the imperative and irrelevant stimuli are presented simultaneously; and the different time courses of the compatibility effects when the imperative and irrelevant stimuli are presented asynchronously
Keywords Interactive activation  Automatic imitation  Dual‐route model  Spatial compatibility  Imitative compatibility  Mirror neuron system
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01252.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Where Do Mirror Neurons Come From?Cecilia Heyes - forthcoming - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews.
Causes and Consequences of Imitation.C. Heyes - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (6):253-261.
Reactions Toward the Source of Stimulation.J. Richard Simon - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):174.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Are Naturalism and Moral Realism Incompatible?Rik Peels - 2013 - Religious Studies (1):1-10.
Toward a Microanalysis of Imitative Actions.Stefan Vogt & David Carey - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):705-706.
The Compatibility of Free Will and Determinism.John V. Canfield - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (July):352-368.
Humanae Vitae and Licit Contraception?Patrick J. Coffey - 1988 - Philosophy and Theology 3 (2):172-182.
Mechanisms of Imitation: The Relabeled Story.Herbert L. Roitblat - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):701-702.
Fischer's Way: The Next Level. [REVIEW]Saul Smilansky - 2008 - Journal of Ethics 12 (2):147-155.
Added to PP index
2012-05-12

Total downloads
37 ( #144,268 of 2,197,334 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #148,981 of 2,197,334 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature