Contemporary Political Theory 9 (1):5-24 (2010)
AbstractWhile being generally appreciative of Sen's theory of capabilities, the point of this paper is to raise some conceptual challenges that arise in addressing entrenched conditions of power and domination from the capability paradigm. The enhancement of people's capability prospects with regard to education, employment, decent living standards and political participation can empower them to challenge various dominating conditions in society. It can also bestow a sense of self-confidence in people to stand up against discriminating practices. Yet, the objectives of the capability theory remain less secure as long as citizens’ capability prospects are dependent on and subjected to arbitrary power and domination. I argue that Sen's theory of capabilities can be strengthened and developed as an effective antidote to the liberal hegemony in political theory by drawing on resources from Pettit's republicanism particularly by accommodating the robustness condition of freedom and by envisioning individual freedom as intimately tied to the common good of the polity
Similar books and articles
Republican freedom and the rule of law.Christian List - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220.
The impossibility of a Paretian republican? Some comments on Pettit and Sen.Christian List - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):65-87.
Liberal and republican conceptions of freedom.Charles Larmore - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):96-119.
Discourse theory and republican freedom.Philip Pettit - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):72-95.
A Note on List's Modal Logic of Republican Freedom.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):341-349.
Liberal Learning as Freedom: A Capabilities Approach to Undergraduate Education.Robert F. Garnett - 2009 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (5):437-447.
Hegel between non-domination and expressive freedom: Capabilities, perspectives, democracy.Michael P. Allen - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):493-512.
Another Instrumental Republican Approach?John Maynor - 2002 - European Journal of Political Theory 1 (1):71-89.
Republican Moments in Political Liberalism.Anthony Simon Laden - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):217-237.
Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 1 capability and freedom: A defence of Sen.Philip Pettit - 2001 - Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):1-20.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Is Liberty Bad for Your Health? Towards a Moderate View of the Robust Coequality of Liberty and Health.M. Allen - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):260-268.
References found in this work
Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory.Amartya Sen - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):317-344.
Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice.Martha Nussbaum - 2003 - Feminist Economics 9 (2-3):33-59.
Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):63-64.