Biology and Philosophy 4 (4):457-481 (1989)
A fundamental philosophical question that arises in connection with evolutionary theory is whether the fittest patterns of behavior are always the most rational. Are fitness and rationality fully compatible? When behavioral rationality is characterized formally as in classical decision theory, the question becomes mathematically meaningful and can be explored systematically by investigating whether the optimally fit behavior predicted by evolutionary process models is decision-theoretically coherent. Upon investigation, it appears that in nontrivial evolutionary models the expected behavior is not always in accord with the norms of the standard theory of decision as ordinarily applied. Many classically irrational acts, e.g. betting on the occurrence of one event in the knowledge that the probabilities favor another, can under certain circumstances constitute adaptive behavior.One interesting interpretation of this clash is that the criterion of rationality offered by classical decision theory is simply incorrect (or at least incomplete) as it stands, and that evolutionary theory should be called upon to provide a more generally applicable theory of rationality. Such a program, should it prove feasible, would amount to the logical reduction of the theory of rational choice to evolutionary theory.
|Keywords||Evolution evolutionary biology fitness decision theory theory of choice rationality rational behavior reductionism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.Edward O. Wilson - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):577-584.
The Theory of Island Biogeography.Robert H. Macarthur & Edward O. Wilson - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (1):178-179.
The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays.Frank Plumpton Ramsey - 1931 - Paterson, N.J., Littlefield, Adams.
Subjective Expected Utility: A Review of Normative Theories. [REVIEW]Peter C. Fishburn - 1981 - Theory and Decision 13 (2):139-199.
Citations of this work BETA
Niche Construction, Adaptive Preferences, and the Differences Between Fitness and Utility.Armin W. Schulz - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (3):315-335.
Adaptive Rationality, Biases, and the Heterogeneity Hypothesis.Andrea Polonioli - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (4):787-803.
Evolution, Rationality, and Coherence Criteria.Andrea Polonioli - 2014 - Biological Theory 9 (3):309-317.
Similar books and articles
Evolutionary Games Without Rationality?Martin Bunzl - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):365-378.
Modeling Rationality, Morality, and Evolution.Danielson Peter (ed.) - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Darwin Meets the Logic of Decision: Correlation in Evolutionary Game Theory.Brian Skyrms - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (4):503-528.
The Organization of Coercion in History: A Rationalist-Evolutionary Theory.Joan Dyste Lind - 1983 - Sociological Theory 1:1-29.
A Response to the Critique of Rational Choice Theory: Lakatos' and Laudan's Conceptions Applied.Kaisa Herne & Maija Setälä - 2004 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):67 – 85.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #123,434 of 2,169,155 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,573 of 2,169,155 )
How can I increase my downloads?