Is English really a formal language?

Abstract

• languages as sets of strings and early transformational grammar • interpreted languages as sets of string-meaning pairs • Montague in ‘Universal Grammar’: There is in my opinion no important theoretical difference between natural languages and the artificial languages of logicians; indeed I consider it possible to comprehend the syntax and semantics of both kinds of languages within a single natural and mathematically precise theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,703

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Brandom’s Incompatibility Semantics.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2008 - Philosophical Topics 36 (2):99-121.
Hand or Hammer? On formal and natural languages in semantics.Martin Stokhof - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (5-6):597-626.
The Role of Artificial Languages.Martin Stokhof - 2011 - In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. London: Routledge. pp. 5440553.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
57 (#248,808)

6 months
1 (#1,016,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references