On the possibility of a pragmatic discourse bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the normative logic of bioethical inquiry

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):635 – 653 (2003)

Authors
Elizabeth F. Cooke
Creighton University
Abstract
Pragmatic bioethics represents a novel approach to the discipline of bioethics, yet has met with criticisms which have beset the discipline of bioethics in the past. In particular, pragmatic bioethics has been criticized for its excessively fuzzy approach to fundamental questions of normativity, which are crucial to a field like bioethics. Normative questions need answers, and consensus is not always enough. The approach here is to apply elements of the discourse ethics of Habermas and Putnam to the sphere of bioethics, in order to develop a normative structure out of the framework of bioethical inquiry as it stands. The idea here is that the process of inquiry contains its own normative structure as it aims to discover norms. Such an approach, which fuses pragmatic bioethics with discourse ethics, may rightly be called a "Pragmatic Discourse Bioethics."
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1076/jmep.28.5.635.18816
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Plea for Pragmatism in Clinical Research Ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Pragmatism Well-Suited to Bioethics?D. Micah Hester - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):545 – 561.
A Functional Taxonomy of Normative Conflict.H. Hamner Hill - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):227-247.
How Bad Is Rape?H. E. Baber - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (2):125-138.
The Hiddenness Argument Revisited.J. L. Schellenberg - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
Consensus and Normative Validity.Harald Grimen - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):47 – 61.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
22 ( #429,777 of 2,289,298 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #842,814 of 2,289,298 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature