AbstractWe propose and defend a distinction between two types of self-censorship: public and private. In public self-censorship, individuals restrain their expressive attitudes in response to public censors. In private self-censorship, individuals do so in the absence of public censorship. We argue for this distinction by introducing a general model which allows us to identify, describe, and compare a wide range of censorship regimes. The model explicates the interaction between censors and censees and yields the distinction between two types of self-censorship. In public self-censorship, the censee aligns her expression of attitudes according to the public censor. In private self-censorship, the roles of censor and censee are fullled by the same agent. The distinction has repercussions for normative analysis: principles of free speech can only be invoked in cases of public self-censorship.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Censorship and Freedom of Speech.Robert Sparrow - 2004 - In Justin Healy (ed.), Censorship and Free Speech. The Spinney Press. pp. 1-4.
Freedom of the Press: On Censorship, Self-Censorship, and Press Ethics.Sören Zibrandt von Dosenrode-Lynge (ed.) - 2010 - Nomos.
The Power of the Word: Culture, Censorship, and Voice.Meredith Tax - 1995 - Women's World.
A Fissure in the Distinction: Hannah Arendt, the Family and the Public/Private Dichotomy.Christopher Philip Long - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (5):85-104.
Perplexities of Filiality: Confucius and Jane Addams on the Private/Public Distinction.Mathew A. Foust - 2008 - Asian Philosophy 18 (2):149 – 166.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Moments of Liberty. (Self-)Censorship Games in the Essays of Virginia Woolf.Paulina Pająk - 2017 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 45 (7):283-301.