Censorship and Two Types of Self-Censorship

Abstract

We propose and defend a distinction between two types of self-censorship: public and private. In public self-censorship, individuals restrain their expressive attitudes in response to public censors. In private self-censorship, individuals do so in the absence of public censorship. We argue for this distinction by introducing a general model which allows us to identify, describe, and compare a wide range of censorship regimes. The model explicates the interaction between censors and censees and yields the distinction between two types of self-censorship. In public self-censorship, the censee aligns her expression of attitudes according to the public censor. In private self-censorship, the roles of censor and censee are fullled by the same agent. The distinction has repercussions for normative analysis: principles of free speech can only be invoked in cases of public self-censorship.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-25

Downloads
50 (#230,496)

6 months
1 (#388,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Cook
University of Edinburgh
Conrad Heilmann
Erasmus University Rotterdam

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Moments of Liberty. (Self-)Censorship Games in the Essays of Virginia Woolf.Paulina Pająk - 2017 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 45 (7):283-301.

Add more citations