On when a semantics is not a semantics: Some reasons for disliking the Routley-Meyer semantics for relevance logic [Book Review]

Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):399 - 413 (1979)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00258440
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What is Computation?B. Jack Copeland - 1996 - Synthese 108 (3):335-59.
Implicational Paradoxes and the Meaning of Logical Constants.Francesco Paoli - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):553 – 579.
Horseshoe, Hook, and Relevance.B. J. Copeland - 1984 - Theoria 50 (2/3):148.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Relevant Theory of Conditionals.Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.
“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R.Edwin D. Mares - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.
The Semantics of Entailment—II.Richard Routley & Robert K. Meyer - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1):53 - 73.
A Star-Free Semantics for R.Edwin D. Mares - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):579 - 590.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
49 ( #110,590 of 2,202,679 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #97,530 of 2,202,679 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature