On when a semantics is not a semantics: Some reasons for disliking the Routley-Meyer semantics for relevance logic [Book Review]

Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):399 - 413 (1979)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00258440
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,157
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What is Computation?B. Jack Copeland - 1996 - Synthese 108 (3):335-59.
Implicational Paradoxes and the Meaning of Logical Constants.Francesco Paoli - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):553 – 579.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Semantics of Entailment—II.Richard Routley & Robert K. Meyer - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1):53 - 73.
“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R.Edwin D. Mares - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.
A Relevant Theory of Conditionals.Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.
A Star-Free Semantics for R.Edwin D. Mares - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):579 - 590.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

46 ( #112,410 of 2,163,662 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,662 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums