Vagueness and Bivalence: A Discussion of Williamson and Simons

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1):193 - 200 (1995)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,463
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Robert Stainton (2010). On 'the Denial of Bivalence is Absurd'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):369-382.
Eugene Mills (2004). Williamson on Vagueness and Context-Dependence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):635–641.
Peter Simons (1995). Multivalence and Vagueness: A Reply to Copeland. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:201 - 209.
F. J. Pelletier & R. J. Stainton (2003). On 'the Denial of Bivalence is Absurd'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):369 – 382.
Larry M. Jorgensen (2011). Russell’s Leibnizian Concept of Vagueness. History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (3):289-301.
Jiri Benovsky (2011). Vagueness : A Statistical Epistemicist Approach. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (3):97-112.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

22 ( #214,086 of 1,925,541 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #212,084 of 1,925,541 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.