Journal of Philosophical Research 36:35-41 (2011)
Brian Ribeiro argues that the pragmatic theory of truth massively misrepresents the actual use of the terms “true” and “truth.” Truths, he observes, can be distinguished from “illusions.” The latter misrepresent reality and the former do not. Psychologists, as they report on the way mentally healthy people commonly overestimate themselves, draw just this distinction. They tell us of many beliefs that are “adaptive” but illusory. Pragmatists cannot draw this distinction because their theory explains truth as adaptiveness. Therefore no sensible person will be a pragmatist. In fact, however, Ribeiro paints a flawed picture of what both psychologists and pragmatists do. Psychologists provide us not with “reality-based accurate beliefs” but instead with beliefs that work, and pragmatists do not identify all beliefs that are adaptive or useful for individuals as true. Pragmatism turns out to be quite sensible, though often misunderstood.
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Really Short Refutation of the Pragmatic Theory of Truth.Brian Ribeiro - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:31-34.
Truth as Convenient Friction.Huw Price - 2010 - In Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Columbia University Press. pp. 167--190.
Introduction.Heather Dyke - 2009 - In From Truth to Reality: New Essays in Logic and Metaphysics. Routledge.
The Unity of Classical Pragmatism.Helmut Pape - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:233-244.
Ramsey on Eliminativism and Self-Refutation.Victor Reppert - 1991 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):499-508.
The Completeness of the Pragmatic Solution to Moore's Paradox in Belief: A Reply to Chan.John N. Williams - 2013 - Synthese 190 (12):2457-2476.
Comments on Philosophy and the Dilemmas of the Contemporary World.John T. Sanders - 1996 - In Józef Niznik & John T. Sanders (eds.), Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty, and Kolakowski. Praeger.
Pragmatism and Bivalence.Cheryl Misak - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):171 – 179.
Evolutionary Debunking Arguments in Three Domains: Fact, Value, and Religion.S. Wilkins John & E. Griffiths Paul - 2012 - In James Maclaurin Greg Dawes (ed.), A New Science of Religion. Routledge.
The Business Ethics of Short Selling and Naked Short Selling.James J. Angel & Douglas M. McCabe - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):239 - 249.
Added to index2011-11-16
Total downloads59 ( #88,814 of 2,168,962 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,364 of 2,168,962 )
How can I increase my downloads?