Anaxagoras' Theory of Matter—I

Classical Quarterly 24 (01):14-30 (1930)
Anaxagoras’ theory of matter offers a problem which, in bald outline, may be stated as follows. The theory rests on two propositions which seem flatly to contradict one another. One is the principle of Homoeomereity: A natural substance such as a piece of gold, consists solely of parts which are like the whole and like one another—every one of them gold and nothing else. The other is: ‘There is a portion of everything in everything’, understood to mean that a piece of gold , so far from containing nothing but gold, contains portions of every other substance in the world. Unless Anaxagoras was extremely muddleheaded, he cannot have propounded a theory which simply consists of this contradiction. One or the other proposition must be reinterpreted so as to bring them into harmony. Some critics attack one, some the other; some try to modify both. Mr. C. Bailey has recently published a fresh attempt to reconstruct the theory in a form consistent with itself. But the result, as he admits, is arbitrary and uneconomical. These defects, like all the contradictions and obscurities found in other accounts of the system, can be traced to the second proposition: ‘There is a portion of everything in everything’, or rather to the construction put upon it. The language is crude, vague, and ambiguous. What does ‘everything’ mean? Has the first ‘everything’ the same sense as the second ? If taken to mean that there is a portion of every material substance in every material substance, the proposition leads to a result for which ‘uneconomical’ is an indulgent epithet
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009838800021273
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,453
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
David J. Furley (1976). Anaxagoras in Response to Parmenides. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (sup1):61-85.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Michael C. Stokes (1965). On Anaxagoras Part I: Anäxagoras' Theory of Matter. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 47 (1):1-19.
G. B. Kerferd (1985). Anaxagoras' Theory of Matter. Ancient Philosophy 5 (2):307-309.
Elizabeth Asmis (1988). Anaxagoras's Theory of Matter. International Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):116-116.
Patricia Curd (2007). Anaxagoras. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

18 ( #255,362 of 1,925,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #418,235 of 1,925,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.