Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):65-87 (2013)
Across countries, governments are urging civil society, in particular charitable and non-profit associations, to take up a part of the social burden, and to produce and provide critical human services and social goods, either independently or on governments' behalf. This type of privatization, or public?private partnership, is encouraged by many on grounds of pluralism and liberty, as empowering individuals and their associations. In this paper, I aim to provide a liberty-based normative argument against privatization. A common view, supported by both conservatives and classical liberals, is that the more social responsibility is left or delegated to civil society, the more civil society will flourish. I contend, by contrast, that when political societies rely on civil society to provide critical goods and services, individuals' freedom of association is threatened. The consequence of privatization is a multiple loss, in terms of individual freedom, value pluralism and the expressive character of civil society
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Public or Private Good? The Contested Meaning of Marriage.Brook J. Sadler - 2010 - Social Philosophy Today 26:23-38.
Civil Societies and Democratization: Assumptions, Dilemmas and the South African Experience.Lorenzo Fioramonti - 2005 - Theoria 44 (107):65-88.
Beyond Liberal Civil Society: Confucian Familism and Relational Strangership.Sungmoon Kim - 2010 - Philosophy East and West 60 (4):476-498.
Association and Recognition in Authoritarian Societies: A Theoretical Beginning.A. Brinton - 2012 - European Journal of Political Theory 11 (3):324-347.
Civil Society Theory and Republican Democracy.Gideon Baker - 2001 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (2):59-84.
Liberalism and Fear of Violence.Bruce Buchan - 2001 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (3):27-48.
Liberty, Autonomy, and Kant's Civil Society.Chris W. Surprenant - 2010 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (1).
Civil Society Without a State? Transnational Civil Society and the Challenge of Democracy in a Globalizing World.Philip Oxhorn - 2007 - World Futures 63 (5 & 6):324 – 339.
Of Private, Common, and Public Property and the Rationale for Total Privatization.Hans-Hermann Hoppe - 2011 - Libertarian Papers 3.
Kant's Non-Voluntarist Conception of Political Obligations: Why Justice is Impossible in the State of Nature.Helga Varden - 2008 - Kantian Review 13 (2):1-45.
Challenging the Third Rail: Iconography and Social Security Reform. [REVIEW]Mark C. Mitschow - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):95 - 103.
Arab Liberalisms: Translating Civil Society, Prioritising Democracy.Michaelle L. Browers - 2004 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1):51-75.
State Autonomy & Civil Society: The Lobbyist Connection.Rogan Kersh - 2000 - Critical Review 14 (2-3):237-258.
Participatory Policy-Making, Participatory Civil Society: A Key for Dissolving Elite Rule in New Democracies in the Era of Globalization.Umut Korkut - 2007 - World Futures 63 (5 & 6):340 – 352.
Added to index2012-01-24
Total downloads35 ( #147,668 of 2,172,047 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,047 )
How can I increase my downloads?