LOGIC TEACHING IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Abstract

We are much better equipped to let the facts reveal themselves to us instead of blinding ourselves to them or stubbornly trying to force them into preconceived molds. We no longer embarrass ourselves in front of our students, for example, by insisting that “Some Xs are Y” means the same as “Some X is Y”, and lamely adding “for purposes of logic” whenever there is pushback. Logic teaching in this century can exploit the new spirit of objectivity, humility, clarity, observationalism, contextualism, and pluralism. Besides the new spirit there have been quiet developments in logic and its history and philosophy that could radically improve logic teaching. One rather conspicuous example is that the process of refining logical terminology has been productive. Future logic students will no longer be burdened by obscure terminology and they will be able to read, think, talk, and write about logic in a more careful and more rewarding manner. Closely related is increased use and study of variable-enhanced natural language as in “Every proposition x that implies some proposition y that is false also implies some proposition z that is true”. Another welcome development is the culmination of the slow demise of logicism. No longer is the teacher blocked from using examples from arithmetic and algebra fearing that the students had been indoctrinated into thinking that every mathematical truth was a tautology and that every mathematical falsehood was a contradiction. A fifth welcome development is the separation of laws of logic from so-called logical truths, i.e., tautologies. Now we can teach the logical independence of the laws of excluded middle and non-contradiction without fear that students had been indoctrinated into thinking that every logical law was a tautology and that every falsehood of logic was a contradiction. This separation permits the logic teacher to apply logic in the clarification of laws of logic. This lecture expands the above points, which apply equally well in first, second, and third courses, i.e. in “critical thinking”, “deductive logic”, and “symbolic logic”.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Logic and the Laws of Thought.Jessica Leech - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.
The laws of logic.E. D. Klemke - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (3):271-277.
On Yuelin Jin's Contribution to the Study of Logic.Guoping Du & Li Zhang - 2000 - Philosophy and Culture 27 (7):676-682.
Formal, Dialectical and Speculative Logic.Richard Monnier - 1989 - Dissertation, Boston University
Aristotle's Prior Analytics and Boole's Laws of thought.John Corcoran - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic. 24 (4):261-288.
On "Can the Law of Contradiction be Contravened?".Sung Wen-Kan - 1970 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 1 (2):213-222.
Differences and Simifarities between Mo Zi and Xun Zi.Zhong-Yuan Sun - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (10):886-896.
On Critical Thinking and Logic.Ming-hui Xiong - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 2:114-119.
Can the Law of Contradiction be Contravened?Chu-Ko Yin-T'ung - 1970 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 1 (2):195-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-08

Downloads
419 (#42,785)

6 months
41 (#83,151)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Corcoran
PhD: Johns Hopkins University; Last affiliation: University at Buffalo

References found in this work

Introduction to mathematical logic.Alonzo Church - 1944 - Princeton,: Princeton University Press. Edited by C. Truesdell.
Abstract.[author unknown] - 2011 - Dialogue and Universalism 21 (4):447-449.
Philosophy of Logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Argumentations and Logic.John Corcoran - 1989 - ARGUMENTAION 3 (1):17-43.

View all 9 references / Add more references