Making sense of retributivism

Philosophy 76 (1):77-110 (2001)

Authors
J. Angelo Corlett
San Diego State University
Abstract
This paper explicates and challenges John Rawl's argument concerning a rule-utilitarian theory of punishment. In so doing, it argues in favour of a retributivist theory of punishment, one that seeks to justify, not only particular forms of punishment, but the institution of punishment itself. Some crucial objections to retributivism are then considered: one regarding the adverse effects of punishment on the innocent, another concerning proportional punishment, a third pertaining to vengeance and retribution, a Marxian concern with retributive punishment, and a concern with the concept of desert. Each objection is deflected in order to ward-off what seem to be the most serious criticisms of a retributivist view of punishment and to clarify the depth of the retributivist position.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819101000067
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,902
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant's Theory of Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (2):206.
Is Hegel a Retributivist?Thom Brooks - 2004 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 25 (1-2):113-126.
Amnesty and Mercy.Patrick Lenta - 2019 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (4):621-641.
Corlett on Kant, Hegel, and Retribution.Thom Brooks - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (4):561-580.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Retribution and Organic Unities.Michael Clark - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):351-358.
Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment.George Schedler - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
Say What? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism.Nathan Hanna - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (2):123-150.
Retributivist Arguments Against Capital Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):188–197.
Kant's Theory of Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (2):206.
Fallibility and Retribution.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (3):337-369.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
241 ( #30,929 of 2,309,727 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #104,333 of 2,309,727 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature