Review of Metaphysics 26 (1):38-56 (1972)

Authors
Abstract
Defining "directly perceive" is made hard enough by the confused and vague ways in which philosophers have used the term, but it is made even more difficult by the fact that it is used quite differently by different philosophers. Two philosophers whose philosophy depends upon a clear understanding of direct perception are Berkeley and Russell. Consider what they say that is relevant to an understanding of their uses of the term. Berkeley, through Philonous, asks Hylas, "Are those things only perceived by the senses which are perceived immediately? Or may those things properly be said to be ’sensible’ which are perceived mediately, or not without the intervention of others?" Russell, in speaking of knowledge by acquaintance, says that "we have acquaintance with anything of which we are directly aware, without the intermediary of any process of inference or any knowledge of truths. Thus in the presence of my table I am acquainted with the sense-data that make up the appearance of my table." Another quite common interpretation is given by Norman Malcolm, who states the definition "A directly perceives x if and only if A’s assertion that he perceives x could not be mistaken."
Keywords Epistemology  Perceiving  Phenomenalism  Realism  Sensation  Berkeley
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI revmetaph1972261136
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,343
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The New Representationalism.A. E. Pitson - 1986 - Philosophical Papers 15 (August):41-49.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Perception: Facts And Theories.Clement W. K. Mundle - 1971 - London: : Oxford University Press,.
Arguments Against Direct Realism and How to Counter Them.Pierre le Morvan - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):221-234.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Perception.Godfrey N. A. Vesey - 1971 - Anchor Books.
The Nature of Perception.Brice Noel Fleming - 1962 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (2):259-295.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
41 ( #259,807 of 2,445,381 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,145 of 2,445,381 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes