Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):283-297 (1999)
The scope of this essay is to introduce and explain the methodology underlying the Lanza Foundation Protocol for the analysis of clinical cases. The essay is divided in three parts. Part one examines the Protocol's methodology within the whole evolutionary framework of argumentation in bioethics. Particular attention is given to the most significant methodologies developed in European bioethics. Part two describes the system of argumentation which serves as a frame for both approaches, namely, the normative and the hermeneutical. Finally, the third part presents in an analytic fashion the operations which define the Protocol itself. The Protocol is the result of an interdisciplinary effort and it provides a detailed grid for analyzing and tackling the ethical components of clinical cases. The Protocol is primarily directed toward Ethics Committees in their consulting activity, yet it has been proven of considerable importance at an educational level also, particular in continuing education programs for health care professionals
|Keywords||bioethics education clinical bioethics clinical consultations clinical ethics committees ethical judgement ethical methodology European approach to bioethics practical rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Foucault at the Bedside: A Critical Analysis of Empowering a Healthy Lifestyle.Ignaas Devisch & Stijn Vanheule - 2015 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21 (3):427-432.
Evaluating Non-Disclosure of Errors and Healthcare Organization: A Case of Bioethics Consultation.Massimiliano Colucci, Anna Aprile & Renzo Pegoraro - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):607-612.
Similar books and articles
Steps Towards a Theory of Medical Practice.Peter Hucklenbroich - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):215-228.
The Use of Consultation in Psychological Practice: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Considerations.Sally Clayton & Bruce Bongar - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (1):43 – 57.
A Method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics.Jonathan Ives - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (6):302-312.
Adding Pep (Protocol, Ethics, and Policies) to the Preparation of New Professionals.Sandra Bruneau - 1998 - Ethics and Behavior 8 (3):249 – 267.
The Development and Function of Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) in the United Kingdom.Vic Larcher - 2009 - Diametros 22:47-63.
Clinical Ethics: Theory or Practice?Jos V. M. Welie - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):295-312.
Does Empirical Research Make Bioethics More Relevant? “The Embedded Researcher” as a Methodological Approach.Stella Reiter-Theil - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):17-29.
The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Handbook for Health Care Ethics Committees.Linda Farber Post - 2007 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hermeneutical Clinical Ethics: A Commentary.Stephen L. Daniel - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Selecting Subjects for Participation in Clinical Research: An Empirical Inquiry and Ethical Analysis.Charles Weijer - unknown
Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem Solving.Joseph J. Fins, Matthew D. Bacchetta & Franklin G. Miller - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):129-143.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads14 ( #332,780 of 2,168,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,837 of 2,168,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?