The Axiom of Infinity and Transformations j: V → V

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (1):37-84 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We suggest a new approach for addressing the problem of establishing an axiomatic foundation for large cardinals. An axiom asserting the existence of a large cardinal can naturally be viewed as a strong Axiom of Infinity. However, it has not been clear on the basis of our knowledge of ω itself, or of generally agreed upon intuitions about the true nature of the mathematical universe, what the right strengthening of the Axiom of Infinity is—which large cardinals ought to be derivable? It was shown in the 1960s by Lawvere that the existence of an infinite set is equivalent to the existence of a certain kind of structure-preserving transformation from V to itself, not isomorphic to the identity. We use Lawvere's transformation, rather than ω, as a starting point for a reasonably natural sequence of strengthenings and refinements, leading to a proposed strong Axiom of Infinity. A first refinement was discussed in later work by Trnková—Blass, showing that if the preservation properties of Lawvere's tranformation are strengthened to the point of requiring it to be an exact functor , such a transformation is provably equivalent to the existence of a measurable cardinal. We propose to push the preservation properties as far as possible, short of inconsistency. The resulting transformation V→V is strong enough to account for virtually all large cardinals, but is at the same time a natural generalization of an assertion about transformations V→V known to be equivalent to the Axiom of Infinity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The spectrum of elementary embeddings j: V→ V.Paul Corazza - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 139 (1):327-399.
Lifting elementary embeddings j: V λ → V λ. [REVIEW]Paul Corazza - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (2):61-72.
Jonsson-like partition relations and j: V → V.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (4):1267-1281.
Distributive proper forcing axiom and cardinal invariants.Huiling Zhu - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):497-506.
Quine W. V.. On ω-consistency and a so-called axiom of infinity.Steven Orey - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (2):128-129.
The Ground Axiom.Jonas Reitz - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1299 - 1317.
The wholeness axiom and Laver sequences.Paul Corazza - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 105 (1-3):157-260.
Consistency of V = HOD with the wholeness axiom.Paul Corazza - 2000 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 39 (3):219-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-13

Downloads
48 (#327,535)

6 months
8 (#529,194)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Higher Infinite.Akihiro Kanamori - 2000 - Studia Logica 65 (3):443-446.
Set Theory.Keith J. Devlin - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):876-877.
Believing the axioms. I.Penelope Maddy - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):481-511.
Adjointness in Foundations.F. William Lawvere - 1969 - Dialectica 23 (3‐4):281-296.
Elementary embeddings and infinitary combinatorics.Kenneth Kunen - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (3):407-413.

View all 16 references / Add more references