A perspectival definition of knowledge

Ratio 23 (2):151-167 (2010)
Abstract
In this paper an improved formulation of the classical tripartite view of knowledge is proposed and defended. This formulation solves Gettier's problem by making explicit what is concealed by the symbolic version of the tripartite definition, namely, the perspectival context in which concrete knowledge claims are evaluated.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2010.00458.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Gettier Problems.Stephen Hetherington - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What Is Common Knowledge?Zachary Ernst - 2011 - Episteme 8 (3):209-226.
What Should a Theory of Knowledge Do?Elijah Chudnoff - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (4):561-579.
Knowledge and the Internal Revisited.John McDowell - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):97-105.
Justification in Memory Knowledge.Andrew Naylor - 1983 - Synthese 55 (2):269 - 286.
Implicit Knowledge as Automatic, Latent Knowledge.John R. Vokey & Philip A. Higham - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):787-788.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-04-20

Total downloads

47 ( #110,757 of 2,168,922 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #187,136 of 2,168,922 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums