Topoi 33 (1):263-274 (2014)
AbstractClassical cognitive science has been characterized by an association with the computational theory of mind. Although this association has produced highly significant results, it has also limited the scope of scientific psychology. In this paper, we analyse the limits of the specific kind of computational model represented by the Chomskian-Fodorian tradition in the study of mind and language. In our opinion, the adhesion to the principle of formality imposed by this specific computational model has motivated the exclusion of consciousness in the reflection on language and, consequently, has led to the inability to account for some aspects of language functioning at the processing level of discourse. The aim of this article is to restore the role of consciousness in discourse comprehension and production processes. Specifically, we argue that the ability to produce and understand discourses is based on individuals’ capacity for navigation in space and time. We will show that the space–time orientation is guaranteed by the projection of the self, which involves a special kind of consciousness
Similar books and articles
Time, language and flexibility of the mind: The role of mental time travel in linguistic comprehension and production.Francesco Ferretti & Erica Cosentino - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):24-46.
心理空间/自然语言意义建构面面观/西方语言学与应用语言学视野/Mental Spaces: 自然语言意义建构面面观.Gilles Fauconnier - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Personality and mental time travel: A differential approach to autonoetic consciousness.Jordi Quoidbach, Michel Hansenne & Caroline Mottet - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1082-1092.
What does language tell us about consciousness? First-person mental discourse and higher-order thought theories of consciousness.Neil Campbell Manson - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (3):221 – 238.
Conscious Representations: An Intractable Problem for the Computational Theory of Mind.Bartlomiej Swiatczak - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):19-32.
Language is in principle inaccessible to consciousness. But why?Maxim Stamenov - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (6):85-118.
Time Travel and Time Machines.Douglas Kutach - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Blackwell.
Why There Cannot be Any Such Thing as “Time Travel”.Rupert Read - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):138-153.
Toward a continuity of consciousness.Michael Spivey & Sarah Cargill - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):216-233.
You Can't Eat Causal Cake with an Abstract Fork: An Argument Against Computational Theories of Consciousness.Matthew Stuart Piper - 2012 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (11-12):154-90.
Retro- and prospection for mental time travel: emergence of episodic remembering and mental rotation in 5 to 8 year old children. [REVIEW]Josef Perner, Daniela Kloo & Michael Rohwer - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (3):802-815.
Why Would Time Travelers Try to Kill Their Younger Selves?Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2005 - The Monist 88 (3):388-395.
Epistemic consciousness.C. N. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):425-441.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Travelling in Time and Space at the Origins of Language.Francesco Ferretti - 2014 - Humana Mente 7 (27).
The Social Brain Is Not Enough: On the Importance of the Ecological Brain for the Origin of Language.Francesco Ferretti - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
References found in this work
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition.James J. Gibson - 1979 - Houghton Mifflin.
Relevance: Communication and Cognition.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986/1995 - Oxford: Blackwell.