Dissertation, University of Birmingham (2019)

Authors
Benjamin Costello
University of Birmingham
Abstract
This thesis will utilise the literature on the distinction between doing harm and allowing harm to develop a novel system of moral sequencing that can be applied to general moral problems to decide if, when, and how an agent should intervene to prevent harm from occurring to another agent. Off the back of this discussion, this thesis will offer a way of determining the responsibility of certain agents for their actions within a moral sequence. These motivations will be at the centre of the discussions in this thesis and will be accomplished by ultimately updating the system of moral sequencing so that it makes sense of practical cases of inner-agent change, which itself provides a justification for intervening earlier, and potentially diminishing the responsibility for agents who have experienced an inner-agent change, in a moral sequence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,323
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Moral Status of Enabling Harm.Samuel C. Rickless - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):66-86.
Moral Tragedy Pacifism.Nicholas Parkin - 2019 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 16 (3):259-278.
When is a Robot a Moral Agent.John P. Sullins - 2006 - International Review of Information Ethics 6 (12):23-30.
Absolutely Clean Hands? Responsibility for What's Allowed in Refraining From What's Not Allowed.Suzanne Uniacke - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (2):189 – 209.
Doing, Allowing, and the Moral Relevance of the Past.Jason Hanna - 2015 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (6):677-698.
Doing, Allowing, and the Moral Relevance of the Past.Jason Hanna - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4):677-698.
Moral Responsibility for Unprevented Harm.Friderik Klampfer - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):119-161.
The Doing/Allowing Distinction: Causal Relevance and Moral Significance.Camilla Francesca Colombo - 2018 - Dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science
Gert on the Limits of Morality’s Requirements. [REVIEW]Dan W. Brock - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):435–440.
Gert on the Limits of Morality’s Requirements.Dan W. Brock - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):435-440.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-15

Total views
4 ( #1,245,002 of 2,448,712 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,641 of 2,448,712 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes