A prima facie defense of Hobbesian absolutism

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):419-449 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hobbes advocates 'thin absolutism'; a system of authority that merely ensures respect of the core concepts of sovereignty – hierarchy and normative closure. This new interpretation of Hobbes's absolutism shows that the concerns regarding sovereign tyranny are not fatal to his account of political authority. With thin absolutism, the sovereign is neither necessarily ineffective nor inherently dangerous. This, then, leaves Hobbesian absolutism in the position of being a 'reasonable contender'– a system of political authority that might require our allegiance, but at the very least requires serious attention.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-12

Downloads
88 (#193,550)

6 months
10 (#272,213)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shane Courtland
University of Minnesota, Duluth

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references