Healthcare Provider Limitation of Life-Sustaining Treatment without Patient or Surrogate Consent

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):442-451 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In June 2015, the major North American and European critical care societies released new joint guidelines that delineate a process-based approach to resolving intractable conflicts over the appropriateness of providing or continuing LST.2 This article frames the new guidelines within the history, ethical arguments, legal landscape, and empirical evidence regarding limitation of LST without surrogate consent in cases of intractable conflict.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Taylor on autonomy and informed consent.Jukka Varelius - 2006 - Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (4):451-459.
Treating the Patient to Benefit Others.Howard Klepper & Robert D. Truog - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):306.
Heuristics and Life-Sustaining Treatments.Adam Feltz & Stephanie Samayoa - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (4):443-455.
Conflict in the Pediatric Setting: Clinical Judgment vs. Parental Autonomy.Amnon Goldworth - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (1):36.
A Healthcare Planner's Conscience.Donald Evans - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (1):108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
11 (#1,110,001)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?