The informed neuron: Issues in the use of information theory in the behavioral sciences [Book Review]

Minds and Machines 5 (4):583-96 (1995)
Abstract
The concept of “information” is virtually ubiquitous in contemporary cognitive science. It is claimed to be “processed” (in cognitivist theories of perception and comprehension), “stored” (in cognitivist theories of memory and recognition), and otherwise manipulated and transformed by the human central nervous system. Fred Dretske's extensive philosophical defense of a theory of informational content (“semantic” information) based upon the Shannon-Weaver formal theory of information is subjected to critical scrutiny. A major difficulty is identified in Dretske's equivocations in the use of the concept of a “signal” bearing informational content. Gibson's alternative conception of information (construed as analog by Dretske), while avoiding many of the problems located in the conventional use of “signal”, raises different but equally serious questions. It is proposed that, taken literally, the human CNS does not extract or process information at all; rather, whatever “information” is construed as locatable in the CNS is information only for an observer-theorist and only for certain purposes
Keywords Behavior  Cognition  Information  Neuron  Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00974987
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,628
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Darwinian Cage.R. Hamilton - 2008 - Theory, Culture and Society 25 (2):105-125.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Why Biological Neuroscience Cannot Replace Psychology.Nick Chater - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-834.
A Slightly Radical Neuron Doctrine.Frank Jackson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):840-841.
Autonomous Psychology and the Moderate Neuron Doctrine.Tony Stone & Martin Davies - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):849-850.
Interpreting Neuroscience and Explaining the Mind.Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):856-866.
Two Radical Neuron Doctrines.Alex Byrne - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):833-833.
A Hypothesis of the Code of Nerve Impulses.Pavel E. Moroz - 1980 - Acta Biotheoretica 29 (2):101-109.
How Trivial is the “Trivial Neuron Doctrine”?Steven G. Daniel - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-835.
A More Substantive Neuron Doctrine.Joe Y. F. Lau - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):843-844.
Neuron Doctrine: Trivial Versus Radical Versus Do Not Dichotomize.Barry Horwitz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-840.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
99 ( #59,548 of 2,235,946 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #193,482 of 2,235,946 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature