Is Moonshadows Lunacy?: The Cowherds Respond

Philosophy East and West 66 (2):617-621 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We thank Amy Donahue for her attention to our work, and we thank the editors of Philosophy East and West for an opportunity to reply. We confess that we were not sure whether to reply. On the one hand we believe that her critique is so misguided that it needs no reply; on the other hand, we were worried that others might take our silence as conceding her point. On reflection, we decided that the larger issue she raises is important enough to restate our position on it: cross-cultural philosophy demands respect for our interlocutors; respect demands serious philosophical engagement, not reflexive deference.We agree with Donahue that those who are trained in the current techniques of their discipline but use those..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moonpaths: Ethics and Emptiness.The Cowherds - 2015 - Oxford University Press USA.
Reply to Clanton and Forcehimes.Robert B. Talisse - 2009 - Contemporary Pragmatism 6 (2):185-189.
Sociology as Reflexive Science.Derek Robbins - 2007 - Theory, Culture and Society 24 (5):77-98.
Discussion: Reply to Hitchcock.Robert N. Brandon - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):531-538.
Defending the Evidential Value of Epistemic Intuitions: A Reply to Stich.Jennifer Nagel - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (1):179-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-20

Downloads
9 (#938,393)

6 months
1 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references