Authors
Nick Cowen
University of Lincoln
Abstract
How sexuality should be regulated in a liberal political community is an important, controversial theoretical and empirical question—as shown by the recent criminalization of possession of some adult pornography in the United Kingdom. Supporters of criminalization argue that Mill, often considered a staunch opponent of censorship, would support prohibition due to his feminist commitments. I argue that this account underestimates the strengths of the Millian account of private conduct and free expression, and the consistency of Millian anticensorship with feminist values. A Millian contextual defense of liberty, however, suggests several other policy approaches to addressing the harms of pornography.
Keywords Mill  liberalism  free expression  feminism  pornography  privacy  censorship
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.Rae Langton - 1993 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4):293-330.
Freedom of Speech Acts? A Response to Langton.Daniel Jacobson - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1):64-78.
The Modern Liberal Theory of Man.Gerald F. Gauss - 1985 - Ethics 95 (2):364-366.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Liberal Anti-Porn Feminism?Alex Davies - 2018 - Social Theory and Practice 44 (1):21-48.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-01-03

Total views
276 ( #29,350 of 2,403,064 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #27,101 of 2,403,064 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes